Search for: "Deal v. Deal"
Results 441 - 460
of 38,428
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2011, 7:47 am
The Third Circuit has decided Gates v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 7:41 am
Albert Feuer, whose very helpful work on Kennedy v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 8:51 am
Matthias Sonntag of Gleiss Lutz even called the court three weeks ago to suggest that today's two Nokia v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:49 am
Hoist UK Ltd v Reid Lifting Ltd; [2010] EWHC 1922 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 215 “CPR r 38.5(3) should be construed as meaning that discontinuance did not affect any proceedings to deal with any question of costs, whether or not such proceedings had already been commenced at the date of discontinuance. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:42 am
Imageview Management Ltd v Jack Court of Appeal “An agent who made a secret deal with his principal's employer breached his fiduciary duty to his principal, forfeited his agency fee and had to account for the secret profit. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:38 am
Regina (Rayner) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “The statutory scheme dealing with the referral of a recalled mental patient to a mental health review tribunal was not incompatible with the patient's rights under article 5.4 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:48 am
Hammonds LLP (a Firm) v Jones Court of Appeal “‘All partners’ in the context of a clause in a partnership deed dealing with accounts, meant partners at any time during the accounting year to which the particular accounts related, whether or not, by the relevant time, they were still partners in the firm. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:29 am
See CCI Entertainment v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:43 am
The Case The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Skinner v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:19 am
Regina (Diep) v Chief Land Registrar [2010] WLR (D) 215 “The policy of the Land Registry in dealing with applications for registration of title to unregistered land based on adverse possession, as embodied in Land Registry Practice Guidance 5 at 6.4, was neither unlawful nor irrational. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:43 am
Today Howe & Russell is filing this cert. reply brief in No. 08-1200, Jerman v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
Well, in addition to the usual causation and adequacy as a matter of law defenses, there's a special legal doctrine that's been crafted to deal with precisely this situation. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
Plea deal rejected Counsel wrong about the law State must reoffer Opinion: pdf html [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:46 pm
Bell, dealing with a technical, but very important question of the filing of habeas petitions. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
This week in Other Barks & Bites: Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) gets active on copyright matters, signing a trio of letters related to piracy and Copyright Office matters; Karyn Temple leaves her post as Register of Copyrights at the Copyright Office; the Supreme Court decides Peters v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:44 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
Do these documents fully account for the SCC’s important ruling in the ESAC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:46 am
Orr v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
The duty of good faith and fair dealing, however, is not without limits, and no obligation can be implied that “would be inconsistent with other terms of the contractual relationship” (Murphy v American Home Prods. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 3:14 am
Like so many court cases dealing with claims to Nazi-looted art, the Cassirer v Thyssen-Bornemisza case has placed much emphasis on the following questions: Which law will the Court apply to the issues it is being asked to consider? [read post]
