Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties" Results 441 - 460 of 1,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2019, 5:15 pm by Ronald Mann
Barnette, under your theory, every time one party joins another party, we would have a new civil action. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:36 am by Ronald Mann
The premise of those cases is that it unduly interferes with the plaintiff’s choice of a state forum for a party not originally named by the plaintiff to remove the entire litigation to federal court. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 8:29 am by Eric Goldman
Second, Defendants argue that Plaintiffs have not met their burden because they have failed to demonstrate that any consumers that intended on purchasing Youngevity products were diverted to purchasing Wakaya products. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
2018 was another busy busy year in the world of copyright, and a continuing global 'theme' was the ongoing battle between 'big tech' and 'big content', with the likes of Google and YouTube continuing to lobby extensively against planned reforms, bringing onboard (some) of the creative community - whilst the  'big content' (including film companies, music companies, the games sector and television) rolled out other creators - and finally seemed to be… [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 1:54 pm by Bob Ambrogi
But if you judge the most important technology by its direct impact on the practice of law, then it would have to be analytics. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
The Consent Order applies to the parties to it and their successors in interest, and TSI does not admit or deny any of the Consent Order's findings of fact or conclusions of law. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 3:50 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
As a result, the "conflicting contentions of the parties . . . present a real, substantial controversy between parties having adverse legal interests, a dispute definite and concrete, not hypothetical or abstract. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“This is simply not a case where the plaintiffs had a number of reasons for purchasing” the product. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 7:41 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
On the other hand, either party can and almost certainly will use its veto power over the other party’s agenda. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:08 am by Peter Mahler
The defendants then allegedly used the $1.1 million in net proceeds as a down payment on a contract to purchase for $19 million a downtown Manhattan hotel property to be owned by a newly formed LLC — apparently with the intention that the original LLC’s members would have a direct or indirect ownership interest therein — and requiring a substantial investment to close the sale. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
In addition to satisfying the requirements of paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of this subdivision, every judgment of divorce, whether uncontested or contested, shall include language substantially in accordance with the following decretal paragraph:ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to pursuant to the [ ] parties' Settlement Agreement dated ___________________ OR [ ] the court's decision after trial, all parties shall duly execute all documents necessary to… [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
In addition to satisfying the requirements of paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of this subdivision, every judgment of divorce, whether uncontested or contested, shall include language substantially in accordance with the following decretal paragraph:ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to pursuant to the [ ] parties' Settlement Agreement dated ___________________ OR [ ] the court's decision after trial, all parties shall duly execute all documents necessary to… [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
On the basis of quantum meruit, the judge awarded the Appellant $45,000 and directed that the parties split the value of the primary residence, as of 2016, on an equal basis. [read post]