Search for: "District of Columbia v. Little" Results 441 - 460 of 1,096
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2023, 5:55 am by Mark Ashton
” But the same opinion is replete with citations to District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
District Judge Michelle Childs of Columbia ruled unconstitutional the state’s refusal to recognize marriages performed outside of the state for same-sex couples living in South Carolina. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 11:01 am by Gail Whittemore
District Court for the District of Columbia, arguing that the appointment of Mulvaney was unlawful, because the CFPB’s succession provision supersedes the FVRA. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Those investigations and prosecutions remain under the authority of the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:26 am by Kate Shaw
Justice Stevens: Of course, some of the memories, the [District of Columbia v.] [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ever since the Court’s watershed decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am by Brianne Gorod
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit subsequently rejected that conclusion, Kavanaugh wrote a dissent, calling into question Humphrey’s Executor and thus the constitutionality of all independent agencies. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Bart Torvik
Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment prevents states from passing laws infringing on the individual right to bear arms announced (or clarified, if you prefer) in District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:45 am by Jeff Gamso
Beaty v FDA 3-27-12 OrderLook, it's a little less than meets the eye. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:40 am by azatty
District Court for the District of Columbia, and his keynote title is “Competency in eDiscovery: An Ethical Dilemma and Cooperation Among Litigants. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:04 am
But what was not similarly clear in the hearing on District of Columbia v. [read post]