Search for: "Doe II v. Doe I"
Results 441 - 460
of 12,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2012, 7:33 pm
This explanation is typically identified as a Paragraph I, II, III, or IV certification. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
DowdPart II. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:15 am
It defied Brown v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm
B.V. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:44 am
For example, should it be sufficient if a person (i) designed the AI algorithm or process that created the work; (ii) contributed to the design of the algorithm or process; (iii) chose data used by the algorithm for training or otherwise; (iv) caused the AI algorithm or process to be used to yield the work; or (v) engaged in some specific combination of the foregoing activities? [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 12:49 pm
The defamatory words will “refer” to you if: (i) they could possibly refer to you, and (ii) they in fact lead reasonable people, who know you (even if not by name), to conclude the words refer to you. ____________________ To read the full decision, click here. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
This question arises because according to the referring court, the to be trade marked shape consists of three essential features, two of which are technically necessary and one of which results exclusively from the nature of the goods themselves:the basic rectangular slab shape: results from the nature of the goods (Article 3(1)(e)(i)),the presence, position and depth of the grooves running along the length of the bar: necessary to obtain technical result (Article 3(1)(e)(ii)),… [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
In February, I wrote about a Fourth Circuit decision in Doe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Robinson cited a case called Boekan v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:56 am
Because it does not have the 1,250 work hours requirement, the decision does not apply to Title II of the FMLA. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:52 pm
I predict a clean win for YouTube. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:43 pm
I predict a clean win for YouTube. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 11:14 am
.; Texas Corral Restaurant II, Inc.; T.C. of Michigan City, Inc.; T.C. of Kalamazoo, Inc.; Chicago Roadhouse Concepts, LLC; Paul Switzer; Victor Spina; and John Doe Corp. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 3:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
As a result of the Forman case and the SEC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 1:04 pm
Rose (London) Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:37 pm
That reality was a state of war equivalent to World War II, the last total war fought by the U.S. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:32 am
I quit WoW earlier in the year, and with Cataclysm out, this decision has reminded me that I miss playing my mage. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:44 pm
Like, ever.Yet I think Justice Kruger does it here. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:13 am
I think I’ll stop here—I’m close to writing more about Cavazos than the opinion itself, and this isn’t even a major case. [read post]
