Search for: "Doe II v. Doe I"
Results 441 - 460
of 12,287
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 4:25 pm
It was also satisfied that it would have had power to grant the relief if Kea had commenced a similar proceeding in Queensland, and that it would have granted the relief, satisfying s 26(1)(b)(i) and (ii) (at [39]-[60]). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:28 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 8:11 am
I disagree,” wrote Justice Thomas. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm
Hodges v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am
I’ll note that if the state had doubled down on the child protection argument, it would have exacerbated its dilemma because the law banned the app for both children and adults. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
Does This Exempt All Contractors? [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:57 am
Benjamin Franklin 1Stanz v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:17 am
I. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:33 am
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:07 am
Res. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 9:28 am
I sincerely appreciate all that you do. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Lawrence County v City of Ogdensburg, 40 NY3d 121, 126 [2023]; see Municipal Home Rule Law §10[1][ii][c] [1]), as well as the power to "adopt and amend local laws not inconsistent with the provisions of the constitution or not inconsistent with any general law relating to its property, affairs or government" (Municipal Home Rule Law §10[1][i]). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Lawrence County v City of Ogdensburg, 40 NY3d 121, 126 [2023]; see Municipal Home Rule Law §10[1][ii][c] [1]), as well as the power to "adopt and amend local laws not inconsistent with the provisions of the constitution or not inconsistent with any general law relating to its property, affairs or government" (Municipal Home Rule Law §10[1][i]). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 3:39 am
They include the following: Standard AI good practice: (i) safety, security and robustness; (ii) appropriate transparency and explainability; (iii) fairness; (iv) accountability and governance; and (v) contestability and redress. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 3:15 am
I’ve also included marked versions of the revised CDIs. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
§§ 921(a)(33)(B)(ii) and 922(g)(9). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:15 am
Instead, according to G2/21, in order to rely on a technical effect for inventive step, it is required that the skilled person would derive said effect as being (i) encompassed by the technical teaching and (ii) embodied by the same originally disclosed invention. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:30 am
ShareThe argument on Wednesday in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]