Search for: "Doe v. Board of Medical Examiners" Results 441 - 460 of 750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2007, 9:48 pm
" Medical monitoring, however, involves "the quantifiable costs of periodic medical examinations. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Legal effect of uncertainty in the common general knowledge Much of the cross-examination and the judgment was devoted to these scientific issues and all the details are not reproduced here. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
The use of medications for high blood pressure, cholesterol or other conditions are important to the claims investigation; and   Schedule an independent medical examination with a board certified cardiologist to determine issues of causation. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Inyo County Board of Supervisors (Dec. 14, 2009, No. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am by Andrew Delaney
In a nutshell, an elementary school student doesn’t have standing to sue the State Board of Education over local school board elections. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 10:50 am
The impact caused the boards on which the plaintiff was standing to break, and the plaintiff fell approximately 25 feet to the basement floor. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 12:00 pm
The impact caused the boards on which the plaintiff was standing to break, and the plaintiff fell approximately 25 feet to the basement floor. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am by Bobby Chen
” Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin (R), who opposed the measure, stated she would “respect the will of the voters” and examine “how best to proceed with adding a medical and proper regulatory framework to make sure marijuana use is truly for valid medical illnesses. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 11:57 am by Eugene Volokh
That person now is a highly functioning professional and his mental health symptoms have been resolved by the medication. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
Jude Medical (IP Frontline) (PatLit) District Court N D California grants summary judgment of invalidity based on on-sale bar: PartsRiver, Inc v Shopzilla, Inc et al (EDTexweblog.com) District Court N D Illinois: Subjective colours require definition to avoid indefiniteness: On the First Ltd v Seiko Epson Corp (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Supreme Court asked to hear Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc – Should obviousness be determined by the… [read post]
Section 101 is applied by Examiners at the USPTO in determining whether patents should be issued; by district courts in determining the validity of existing patents; in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in appeals from Examiner rejections, in post-grant-review (PGR) proceedings, and in covered-business-method-review (CBM) proceedings; and in the Federal Circuit on appeals. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 9:14 am by Steve Hall
However, despite the variety of ways that intellectual disability may appear to a layman, it is a medical diagnosis based on clinical indications; an individual either has it, or he does not. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am by Kelly
Ambu AS (Patently-O) CAFC: Preamble held not limiting because body of claim sets forth complete invention: American Medical Systems v Biolitec (Filewrapper) District Court E D Michigan: General allegations of deceptive intent fail to state a claim for false marking: Josephs v. [read post]