Search for: "Doe v. Doe Governmental Entity"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm
A U.S. person need not, however, report certain foreign financial accounts, including those: owned by a governmental entity; owned by an international financial institution; held in an individual retirement account of which the U.S. person is an owner or beneficiary; held in a retirement plan of which the U.S. person is a participant or beneficiary; or part of a trust of which the U.S. person is a beneficiary, if a U.S. person (trust, trustee of the trust… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:30 am
” Romer v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:17 pm
Code sec. 551.001(3)] does not infringe on the First Amendment rights of elected officials by requiring them to conduct government meetings in public.In a 37-page decision denying the plaintiffs' request for declaratory judgment, the federal court held that governmental entities "have no First Amendment right to conduct public business behind closed doors. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Does that phrase mean that § 101.106(f) applies only when the governmental unit has waived its immunity from suit, or does it apply even when the governmental unit is immune from the particular claim? [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm
On Friday, I wrote about an amicus brief, for me and 54 other antitrust and competition policy scholars, that I wrote in Teladoc v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
”); Doe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 6:09 am
In Carrick v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:21 am
Supreme Court decision in 1982’s Plyler V. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 12:52 pm
Id. at 430.Because under the TTCA, a governmental entity's immunity from suit is waived only to the extent the TTCA authorizes liability, a governmental entity is immune from suits resulting from the emergency operation of an emergency vehicle unless the operator acted recklessly. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:19 am
In Campbell v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:50 am
In this case, a local governmental entity required petitioner to construct and dedicate numerous off-site physical improvements on public property as a condition for governmental approval of discretionary permits to develop petitioner’s property notwithstanding the absence of proportionality between the property exacted and the projected impact of the development. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 3:39 pm
In Romer v. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 8:19 pm
The court disagreed, holding that the Hawaii Constitution requires all governmental entities, including the state and "political subdivisions" to "conserve and protect Hawaii's natural beauty and natural resources. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Other plaintiffs (also respondents here) included the three municipalities whose ordinances we have cited and certain other governmental entities which had acted earlier to protect homosexuals from discrimination but would be prevented by Amendment 2 from continuing to do so. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
Fritz v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 11:04 pm
The Supreme Court decision is Sheetz v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 6:56 am
Proposition of Law 2 A former employee of a political subdivision who brings an intentional tort claim that accrues after he or she is no longer an employee of the governmental entity is not an “employee” covered under R.C. 2744.09(B). [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Senators in the 19th century under the original Constitution—that do not involve fashioning general regulatory policy), “Legislature” does NOT mean any specific state governmental body, but instead the state’s lawmaking process, a process that can include within its umbrella the people of a state undertaking direct democracy. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
Corp. v. [read post]
