Search for: "Doe v. Group Long Term, et al"
Results 441 - 460
of 506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2010, 1:39 pm
See J.A. 5768 ("The Moser et al device clearly lacks (1) a 'disposable wax guard' that is (2) 'readily installed and replaced by a user' . . . as expressly called for in applicant's claim 1. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:57 pm
Pension Committee of the Univ. of Montreal Pension Plan, et al., v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm
Then, a week after the Circuit Court decision, the McDonald group filed theirs (McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:00 am
The United States filed an amicus brief in support of Lewis et al. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 12:59 pm
Humanitarian Law Project et al. (08-1498), and Humanitarian Law Project et al. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
One reason is the limited degree of uniformity created by the New York Convention which does not entirely eliminate differences between the national jurisdictions (especially in the context of arbitrability and public policy).11 The perspective of European law is different. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:44 am
Douglas Bremner, M.D., et. al., “Functional Brain Imaging Alterations in Acne Patients Treated With Isotretinoin,” 162 Am. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
(See Eisenberg, et al., Cal. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 5:27 pm
UNUM Provident, et al (09-13687). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
A developer, having lost one CEQA case on the basis of the water supply analysis, entered into a long term agreement with a district to purchase recycled water, intending to use this agreement to remedy the deficiencies in its water supply analysis. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:17 am
BC Entertainment, Inc. et al, Case No. 08-cv-00579 (D. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here National Union Fire Insurance Company et al. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 11:12 am
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in Bilski, et al., v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:05 pm
Koninklijke Phillips et al (CAFC 2009-1208, 1209) precedential This is a basic contract dispute, governed by state law. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
Roberts, et al., Respondents, vTishman Speyer Properties, L.P., et al., Appellants. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
---Community Development ClinicClass Unique #: 28930 Course #: 397C Instructor: Way Et Al. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
NFL, et al (08-661) case (argument date unscheduled), which will test whether the National Football League's exclusive apparel licensing deal with Reebok violates antitrust rules. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1986) (describing the analytical method as "subtract[ing] the infringer's usual or acceptable net profit from its anticipated net profit realized from sales of infringing devices"); see also John Skenyon et al., Patent Damages Law & Practice § 3:4, at 3-9 to 3-10 (2008) (describing the analytical method as "calculating damages based on the infringer's own internal profit projections for the infringing item at the time… [read post]
