Search for: "Doe v. Simpson" Results 441 - 460 of 546
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am by Legal Beagle
Heather Capital - Lord Woolman’s opinion: Heather Capital Ltd (In Liquidation) v Levy & McRae and othersOUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2015] CSOH 115 CA207/14NOTE BY LORD WOOLMANIn the causeHEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Pursuers; againstLEVY & McRAE AND OTHERS Defenders:Pursuer:  Lord Davidson of Glen Clova QC;  Shepherd & Wedderburn LLPDefenders:  Clark QC, J Brown;  Simpson & Marwick14 August… [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 5:01 pm
and the Illinois Business Law Journal; special points for the Simpsons reference in that last one) . [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 6:50 am by Benjamin Bissell
Ben noted Diane Webber’s account of the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in Hassan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
  As many blogs are showing, legal analysis does not have to be boring. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:26 am
On Wednesday HH Judge Birss QC handed down his costs judgment after a prior successful claim by Dame Vivienne against Mr Knight in the Patents County Court (PCC): Westwood v Knight [2011] EWPCC 11 (11 May 2011). [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
Sikhism does not have its own legal code; and Baldip Singh, of counsel, stressed that it was not a religious tribunal: its purpose would be “to assist Sikh families in their time of need when dealing with conflict and disputes in line with Sikh principles”. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am by Miriam Seifter
Any other reading would lead to what the Supreme Court – in Crown Simpson Pulp Co v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
  Take one of the landmark cases on concurrent cause theory, Partridge v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
 The appeal in the case of Simpson v Mirror Group is floating on 24 and 25 May 2016. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court’s latest judgment, which upholds the criminal defamation provision in the IPC, does not curb free speech, it is argued in The Times of India. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Every judicial candidate says they want to be “fair” and “unbiased,” but unless you know them personally (or know someone who does) the only real information we have to go on is their professional experience. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, does not appear to have gone on record as vehemently opposing Roe v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]