Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 441 - 460 of 8,631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 1:45 pm
  But I'm going to do so anyway.I think it's a major omission that nowhere in the Court's opinion does it mention, discuss or even cite Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3)(C). [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 12:32 pm
  Regardless, she does an admirable job advocating for her conclusion. [read post]
21 May 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Superior Court of Los Angeles Countyhttp://t.co/iwRODDfdUw -> Class action certified over download insurance KHODAY v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 3:50 am by Andrew Trask
But, more instructively, the court also held that individual lawsuits were superior to the proposed class action. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Pennsylvania Superior Court has handed down a criminal court decision which could have implications in the trial of a civil litigation matter. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 7:00 am by Michael Linhorst
The Supreme Court first recognized the doctrine in 1980 in Richmond Newspapers v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 3:12 pm by Uthman Law Office
He filed a motion in the superior court, seeking to develop a record of mitigating circumstances for an eventual youth offender parole hearing (see People v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 1:35 pm
The New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division recently held that a pollution exclusion contained in a D&O liability policy does not bar coverage for shareholder claims alleging fraudulent statements in SEC disclosures concerning alleged pollution. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:12 am
The Attorney General does not dispute this conclusion.Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:36 am by Mack Sperling
  It is just not going to happen, as illustrated (yet again) by Judge Bledsoe's decision in County of Catawba v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:39 pm
”   The cap is "seven hours of total testimony,” a trial court can grant up to an additional seven hours -- “for no more than 14 hours of total deposition" -- if more than 20 defendants appear at the deposition, the court determines that the additional time is warranted in the interest of fairness, and the additional time does not appear to endanger the plaintiff’s health. [read post]