Search for: "Does 1 - 41" Results 441 - 460 of 4,674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The document does not explicitly indicate how this substance was produced or which ingredients it contains. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:45 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Claim 1 of the main request (claim 1 as granted) reads as follows (with feature annotation as used by the opposition division included):"1.1 A method of cleaning crankcase gas generated during operation of an internal combustion engine (31; 41) in its crankcase, characterized by1.2 - use of a centrifugal separator (34; 50) that includes a centrifugal rotor (8) arranged for rotation by means of a driving motor (9; 49) and arranged by its rotation to suck crankcase gas… [read post]
The EUTM application “CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst” in classes 9 and 41 was opposed on the basis of earlier registrations for CFA, CFA INSTITUTE,        and    . [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 2:32 pm
If a blog post doesn’t receive any comments, does that mean you struck out? [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 1:13 pm by Giancarlo Frosio
The Swedish court’s second question was whether the answer to question 1 depends on whether the copyright owner restricts access to the work. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The evidence provided with the statement of grounds of appeal with respect to distinctions between endodontic procedures and the treatment of dental caries does not reveal any differences that are reflected in the wording of claim 1 in suit. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:29 am by Andrew Sutter
– Iyov 41:3 (Tanakh) Whatsoever is under the whole heaven is Mine. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by John Elwood
So when does Menards get its case? [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:53 am by David Cheifetz
The Riddle: Q: How many Canadian judges does it take to create a paradox? [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:48 am by John Hopkins
This subsection does not prevent a physician licensed under chapter 458 or chapter 459 or a dentist licensed under chapter 466 who submits a verified written expert medical opinion from being subject to denial of a license or disciplinary action under s. 458.331(1)(oo), s. 459.015(1)(qq), or s. 466.028(1)(ll). [read post]