Search for: "Does 1-95"
Results 441 - 460
of 3,683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2022, 3:58 am
Why does anyone ever think otherwise? [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
Journal of Accounting and Economics 71(1): 1-22. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 11:38 am
The CCFPL provides that it does not apply to a CFL licensee “to the extent that person or employee is acting under the authority” of a CFL license. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
” (FSIS 2022) The proposal does not address preventing Salmonella contamination. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
What does the text mean? [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 11:03 am
Throughout the day, her diarrhea became voluminous and as frequent as every 1-2 hours and turned frankly bloody. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 10:25 pm
What Does ERISA Require? [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 3:08 am
The Directive does not lay down an upper limit to the pecuniary sanction, so Member States are free to set it themselves. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm
How To Create a LinkedIn Company Page 1. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 11:54 am
If he puts the property out at $550,000 and his buyer does a 30 year finance of 95% at 5.5%, that buyer is going to pay $3,000 a month + $700 in real estate taxes. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The Second Circuit therefore certified a question to this Court: "Does the 'special duty' requirement—that, to sustain liability in negligence against a municipality, the plaintiff must show that the duty breached is greater than that owed to the public generally—apply to claims of injury inflicted through municipal negligence, or does it apply only when the municipality's negligence lies in its failure to protect the plaintiff from an injury… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The Second Circuit therefore certified a question to this Court: "Does the 'special duty' requirement—that, to sustain liability in negligence against a municipality, the plaintiff must show that the duty breached is greater than that owed to the public generally—apply to claims of injury inflicted through municipal negligence, or does it apply only when the municipality's negligence lies in its failure to protect the plaintiff from an injury… [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 7:10 am
Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2020) (memorandum opinion) Jackson ruled in Kiakombua v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Such an estimate, however, does not necessarily give a realistic prediction of the risk. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
On January 4, 2022, the Canada United States Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) Panel on Canada’s Dairy Tariff Rate Quotas (TRQs) released its ruling.[1] The Panel Decides—Both Sides Claim Victory The Panel ruled that Canada’s practice of reserving 85-100% of dairy TRQs for processors violated Article 3.A.2.11(b) of CUSMA. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
How does a company take advantage of this special dispensation? [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 12:40 pm
” FAR 16.202-1. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 10:00 am
Still, the available data does suggest that the ITC is not invalidating two-thirds of the design patents asserted there. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 7:43 am
See G.S. 90-95(d)(2) (2020). [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 2:18 am
The Court of Appeal decision: an expansive approach to data protection In respect of the compensation claimed due to this collection of browser-generated information (BGI), it had been questioned on behalf of Google whether “damage” had been suffered according to DPA 1998 section 13 and Article 23(1) Directive 95/46/EC to warrant compensation. [read post]
