Search for: "Does I & II"
Results 441 - 460
of 23,590
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2018, 5:49 pm
FTC said (accurately, I believe): “This Court does not possess the authority to judicially rewrite those operative statutes through a speculative inference not reflected in the legislation. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:56 am
Because it does not have the 1,250 work hours requirement, the decision does not apply to Title II of the FMLA. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:43 am
I will address his curious reluctance to address the text of the Rome Statute in Part II of my response; in this post, I want to address his arguments concerning IHL. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
At least based on the many fact-patterns I have looked at in both Guantanamo habeas cases and the CSRT and ARB documents that came before them, I think this point has much more merit with respect to guesthouses than it does with respect to training camps–which is one of the reasons I would not treat guesthouse stays as nearly as probative of membership as training. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 3:42 am
Even the UNCITRAL Model Law on ICA does not apply Section 27 to foreign arbitrations. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:50 am
” Doe sued Spencer for VAWRA, IIED, negligence, and public disclosure of private facts. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
The company currently offers three fascinating scents: "Scorching Doe" (made with the urine of a doe in heat), "Buck Confrontation" (made with the urine of a male deer), and "All Season Anytime" (a "curiosity scent" with notes of vanilla and apple). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:50 am
For DGTEK v Digiteck I, see here. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 1:47 pm
Odds and Ends: On Human Reproduction Cartelising the Money Machines Does Free Love Promote or Impede Successful Marital Search? [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
Apr. 25, 2019) Rule 15(aaa), a rule unique to the Court of Chancery, requires plaintiffs faced with a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim to either: (i) amend their complaint; or (ii) stand on their pleading and risk dismissal with prejudice. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 9:00 am
Here, the alleged disclosure violations concerned (i) information regarding a competing bid, (ii) potential conflicts involving one director, and (iii) the banker’s compensation and potential conflicts. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 8:49 pm
The decision highlights that Swiss type claims do not fall within the relevant legislative provisions for patent term extensions under (i) section 70 (2)(a) for a pharmaceutical substance per se, or (ii) section 70 (2)(b) for a pharmaceutical substance when produced by a process that involves the use of recombinant DNA technology. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 8:30 am
Charles Barzun In Part I of this post, I sought to explain the point of a joke tweet I had made in which I offered a theory of living constitutionalism as a satire. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
It does sound like the company has a history of retaliation. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:59 am
In Part II of this compilation [Part I was TTABlogged here yesterday], the second quintet of TTAB cases includes two interesting genericness rulings: the THUMBDRIVE decision in particular catching many by surprise. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:11 am
A week ago, I scoffed at a claim in a lawsuit against Bayer that it violated Title VII by failing to provide work-life balance that was attractive to women seeking promotion. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
So… Narey Report: A Blueprint for the Nation’s Lost Children – Part II In part I of this blog post I dealt primarily with the *cough* provenance of the report, and with rigour of the referencing and the source material that Martin Narey relied upon in his report. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
This does remind me of a Seinfeld episode however. [read post]
5 May 2010, 4:27 am
(I realize the Type I/Type II metaphor is not a precise fit here). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:31 pm
I leave it to legal ethicists to determine whether he is entitled to pro bono assistance. [read post]
