Search for: "Downloader 54" Results 441 - 460 of 715
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Case Law, 6th ed., 2010, I.C.1.4). [6.4.3] The appellant proprietor contested at the oral proceedings (OPs) before the board that the unidentified prior art mentioned in the opposed patent at paragraph [0013] was state of the art under A 54(2) EPC 1973. [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:46 am
After some delay, the petition is now available for downloading; the link is below. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 8:41 pm
Computing investigation found that while working with games firm Atari, Davenport Lyons wrongly accused a Scottish couple, aged 54 and 66, of infringing copyright of a game ‘Race O7'. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:28 am by farrah nagrampa
Podcasts finally experienced a slight uptick with the percentage of students who downloaded or listened to 1-5 Podcasts growing from 20% in 2012 to 30% in 2013, and those who downloaded or listened to more than five Podcasts increased marginally (from 15% to 16%). [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:37 am by Legal Beagle
The report said it could find no clear explanation for the disparity, but said it may be the case that there are higher numbers of Catholics among younger age brackets in Northern Ireland.The figures showed that 56% of prisoners in Hydebank Wood Young Offender Centre were Catholic, while 54% of prisoners at Maghaberry prison were Catholic, with 56% of inmates in Magilligan being Catholic. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”The present decision shows that Pascal’s observation also holds true in patent law.The Board had to decide on an appeal by the patent proprietors against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to maintain the opposed patent in amended form.One of the core questions before the Board was whether the claims were entitled to the priority.NB: All legal provisions refer to the EPC 1973.[6] The assessment of inventive step hinges on the question whether or not document D3 constitutes… [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This decision contains interesting paragraphs both on reformatio in peius and disclaimers.On March 11, 2003, the Opposition Division (OD) had maintained the patent in amended form.The opponent filed an appeal.In a first decision (T 724/03) the Board held that the disclaimer allowed by the OD did not contravene A 123. [read post]
3 May 2017, 1:05 pm
The Forensic examination also disclosed that Doe had downloaded thousands of files known by their `hash’ values to be child pornography. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:40 am by Ben
Those sites also often provide additional information, inter alia on the estimated download time and the number of active ‘seeders’ and ‘leechers’ for a particular file. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 5:10 am
Those sites also often provide additional information, inter alia on the estimated download time and the number of active ‘seeders’ and ‘leechers’ for a particular file. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As the present disclaimers have the purpose of restoring novelty over D4b, it is necessary in view of the criteria developed in decision G 1/03 for allowability of disclaimers introduced to restore novelty to determine whether D4b published between the priority date claimed and the filing date represents state of the art pursuant to A 54(3) or a disclosure pursuant to A 54(2). [6] In the context of assessing whether D4b is state of the art pursuant to A 54(3) or A… [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This is a revocation appeal.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board (and claim 1 as granted) read (in English translation):Process for recovering clear solutions containing cell contents from biological samples in a high throughput process, comprising the steps of(a) preparing a plurality of protein-containing solutions which contain insoluble ingredients in separate chambers of a multi-chamber filtration unit,(b) removing insoluble ingredients by filtering the solutions through the… [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Swiss-type claims are a dying species, but from time to time we still have decisions dealing with them.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation):Use of an active substance in the form of microcrystals or microgranules comprising a coating that masks their taste and a mixture of excipients, wherein the mixture of excipients comprises one or more disintegrating agents and one or more swelling agents or soluble agents, for the manufacture of a rapidly disintegratable… [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Both the patent proprietor and the opponent filed an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division to maintain the patent in amended form. [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This period overlaps the priority date of the impugned patent (November 9, 2004); thus the question of secrecy is relevant for determining whether the control systems of the CSCP belong to the prior art (A 54(2)).The [opponent] argued that the know-how according to Article 2.3 of the agreement referred to the manufacture of the product concerned by the agreement (Vertragsprodukt), i.e. the slabs, and not to the CSCP itself.However, the Board is of the opinion that the obligation of secrecy… [read post]