Search for: "Du Pont v. Du Pont" Results 441 - 460 of 568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2017, 8:25 am by Nikki Siesel
The Board cited the general proposition that one du Pont factor may be dispositive in a likelihood of confusion analysis, especially when the single factor is the dissimilarity between the marks. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by Nikki Siesel
In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 3:11 pm
 In the US, the eight factors in Polaroid Corp. v Polarad Elect. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm by Scott Hervey
 The court found that this evidence “strongly favors a finding of likelihood of confusion with respect to the du Pont factor regarding the relatedness of the goods. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 3:22 am
Applicant did not address the issue of fame.Fame, when found, plays a dominant role in the du Pont analysis. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:04 am
The all-day session will be held on 5 February 2020 in Room MR080, University of Geneva, Bd du Pont d'Arve, 1211 Genève 4. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:39 am by John L. Welch
Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found confusion likely. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 7:53 pm by Nikki Siesel
The Board considered several other du Pont factors and on balance, the evidence weighed in favor of finding no likelihood of confusion among the sources. [read post]