Search for: "ELLIS v. STATE" Results 441 - 460 of 903
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2015, 7:28 pm
Where testator dies seized of real property in several states the courts of each state may construe the will as to the realty situated in its own state (Matter of Good's Will, 304 N.Y. 110, 116, 106 N.E.2d 36, 39, supra; In re Ellis' Estate, Sur., 139 N.Y.S.2d 640; De Vaughn v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am by INFORRM
Ellis also reviewed new media protocols for dealing with acts of terrorism in New Zealand. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 8:28 am
Following a December 2006 hearing in which experts weighed in with conflicting opinions, state District Court Judge Mark Kent Ellis rejected some of the methods used by Dr. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by Gregory Dell
In Marilyn Ellis v Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, the plaintiff Marilyn Ellis with her California disability attorney contended that she was at all times a participant to a group long term disability plan with the policy number 63311 that was provided by the Sun Life Assurance Company (Sun Life). [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
”  [By the way, the Bexis drug and medical device desk book lists a couple of other cases that have rejected plaintiff-side attempts to use preemption to undermine the learned intermediary rule:  Ellis v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Indeed, it is this relationship which gives rise to the duty imposed upon the doctor to properly treat his or her patient (see Bazakos v Lewis, 12 NY3d 631, 634; Payette v Rockefeller Univ., 220 AD2d 69, 72; Ellis v Peter, 211 AD2d 353; Heller v Peekskill Community Hosp., 198 AD2d 265; LoDico v Caputi, 129 AD2d 361, 363; see also Speigel v Goldfarb, 66 AD3d 873, 874). [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Assoc. v Trump Empire State Partners, 245 AD2d 225, 227 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 1:56 pm by Giles Peaker
On disability discrimination: i) This was an issue of an ongoing act, not just the date of the issue of proceedings, it being “incumbent on the lender to consider the appropriateness of proceedings at every stage”. in R (JL) v Secretary of State for Defence [2013] EWCA Civ 449 the Court of Appeal confirmed that it is open to a Defendant to raise issues of human rights even at the stage of enforcement. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 10:16 am
Case Name: Concerned Citizens of Spring Creek Ranch v. [read post]