Search for: "English v. English" Results 441 - 460 of 11,155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2010, 9:12 am by michael
High Court (Chancery Division) Somerfield Stores Ltd v Spring (Sutton Coldfield) Ltd [2010] EWHC 2084 (Ch) (04 August 2010) English v English & Anor [2010] EWHC 2058 (Ch) (03 August 2010) Aerostar Maintenance International Ltd & Anor v Wilson & Ors [2010] EWHC 2032 (Ch) (30 July 2010) Sands & Anor v Monem & Ors [2010] EWHC 1972 (Ch) (30 July 2010) Re Halliwells LLP & Ors [2010] EWHC 2036 (Ch) (30 July 2010) Experience… [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 8:11 pm by Daily Record Staff
Ho), the plaintiff below, seeks a new trial because the court required that she elect to testify either in Chinese or in English. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:54 am by Mark Keenan
The Supreme Court has ruled that the pre-nuptial agreeement signed in the case of Radmacher -V- Garantino is enforceable and that it agreed that in the right case such agreements can have decisive or compelling weight. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:40 pm by Michel-Adrien
The new kidnapping offence would be committed where a person, D:without lawful authority or reasonable excuse;intentionally uses force or the threat of force; in order to take another person V, or otherwise cause them to move in his company. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 8:29 am by David Friedman
Related to Middle English feodary "one who holds lands of an overlord in exchange for service" (late 14c.). [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:35 pm by Lisa McElroy
  Marshall was the author of one of the Court’s best-known opinions, tMarbury v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:51 am
 Judge Bright concludes his dissent by saying:  "[T]he pro se petitioner in this case alleges a lack of English proficiency, a history of severe mentalimpairment, and confinement in administrative segregation during the period in which he was required to file a federal habeas petition. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:03 am by sally
Cavel USA, Inc and another v Seaton Insurance Co and another [2009] EWCA Civ 1363; [2009] WLR (D) 369 “The concept of fraud in the English commercial law context in a case having an international flavour was much wider than the concept of deceit flowing from a fraudulent misrepresentation and could extend to cases without the need to establish the element of dishonesty of the person against whom the fraud was alleged. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 5:50 pm by Amy Howe
Two years ago, the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]