Search for: "Federal v. Levine"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2011, 9:44 am
Hemmens & Levin, supra, at 18. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:18 am
In Khan v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:05 pm
[Ira Stoll, more] “Returning to Common-Law Principles of Insider Trading After United States v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:38 am
Levine (prescription drugs, no Medical Device Amendments’ preemption clause) and Medtronic v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:00 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), and weaponized by our side in PLIVA v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:10 am
At Sentencing Law and Policy, Doug Berman posts part of the Constitution Projects' statement urging Congress to enact legislation to ensure that federal prosecutors fulfill their obligations under Brady v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 3:56 pm
Attorney Sharon Cohen Levin, asset forfeiture unit chief in the southern district of New York, describes the government's investigation in court papers filed in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:54 am
" EFF is represented by law firms Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP and Jassy Vick Carolan. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 10:11 am
Yesterday in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:22 am
Our Chicago medical malpractice attorneys at Levin & Perconti continue to stand by our faith and belief in the legal justice system. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
In Shah v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:24 pm
Radu v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Speaking of jury trials – or rather, the lack of them – today is the day that the SCOTUS will hear arguments in SEC v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:22 pm
Levine was decided by a comfortable enough 6-3 margin. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 6:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 5:48 am
by Brian WolfmanCheck out Levine v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:06 am
Levine (06-1249), ordered the Third Circuit Court to reconsider rulings that federal law preempted a lawsuit in federal court based on Delaware law over advertising the anti-heartburn drug, Nexium, and that that federal law preempted lawsuits under state laws challenging the labels on the anti-depression drugs Paxil and Zoloft. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:16 am
Levine, and while 2011’s PLIVA v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:33 am
Circuit Courts of Appeal have held that the ADEA is the exclusive remedy, the court found the Seventh Circuit’s contrary reasoning in Levin v Madigan “highly persuasive. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 3:45 am
Curtis V. [read post]
