Search for: "Fisher v. Rule" Results 441 - 460 of 1,436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Not every hot-coffee-spill case is like Liebeck v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
The Commonwealth also filed a motion to report a question of law to the Appeals Court prior to trial pursuant to Massachusetts Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 34. . . . [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 11:57 am by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Don Willett's opinion yesterday in Fisher v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Frances G. Zacher
What is different about Florida's doctrine, however, is that "it is the only state to have adopted this rule by judicial decree," as noted by the recent case Salsbury v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 8:45 am
Fisher lost when the Supreme Court ruled that the technician's certification of the intoxication devices were not testimonial because the certifications were routine administrative tasks and too attenuated from the prosecution of the charges against Fischer for the statements to be ‘testimonial' in the sense required under Crawford (Crawford v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:28 pm by Michael Lowe
 As Stanford Law Professor Jeffrey Fisher argued to the Justices last week: “The Fifth Amendment prohibits using a person’s silence during a noncustodial police interview against him at trial, and nothing about the specific facts of this case give this Court cause to refrain from applying that rule here. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:58 am by Amy Howe
At Balkinization, David Gans discusses the amicus brief that the Constitutional Accountability Center filed in Fisher v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 3:13 am by Walter Olson
Andrew Cuomo’s grab for more regulatory power over financial institutions would erode due process protections [New York Post quoting Mark Calabria] “Supreme Court Probes Whether Miami Can Sue Banks Over Foreclosure Crisis” [Daniel Fisher, earlier on Bank of America v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:18 am by Nathan Koppel
In light of the ruling in Wal-Mart v Dukes, Fisher writes, the tobacco industry likely hoped that the court would take a skeptical view of smoking class actions and agree to hear the case. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Holder, in which the Court struck down the coverage formula used to determine which jurisdictions must comply with the preclearance requirement of the Voting Rights Act, and Fisher v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 11:36 am
” JW Note:   Is the CAFC  apparently unconcerned about the effects of KSR because the CAFC had already adjusted their framework for obviousness analyses  in anticipation of the ruling  (See, e.g., Dystar Textilfarben GMBH & Co Deutschland KG v. [read post]