Search for: "Fletcher v. District Court"
Results 441 - 459
of 459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2007, 4:33 am
The fact that the district court legally erred does not make a sentence illegal. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 3:54 am
But the district court did not credit Patterson's testimony, instead finding that Patterson expressly consented to a search of the closet. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 2:13 am
The 9th (Fletcher joined by Rawlison and Selna) held that under AEDPA, Ariz. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 7:24 am
Educate the district court: The big loser in Fort isn't the defense - it's the district court. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 4:20 am
This case has been through the system -- trial court, appeal in state court, personal restraint petition in state court, federal district court, federal court of appeals -- 13 years! [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:20 am
The 9th reverses a district court's granting of habeas relief. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 2:14 am
Fletcher) hold that under the recent Supremes decision in US v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 4:36 pm
Wetmore v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 1:55 pm
Wetmore v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 8:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 10:41 am
US v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
The district courts held that the claim was either not ripe, nor not in violation of the treaty. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
In Lyons, the court amended an opinion to state without citation: "The argument that the district court should have imposed a 'beyond a reasonable doubt' standard is foreclosed by our case law. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 10:42 am
Perhaps just to prove my claim that the Supreme Court is most pro-defendant appellate court on issues of sentencing procedure, the (purportedly liberally) Ninth Circuit today in US v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 12:37 pm
See, e.g., McGuire v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 2:55 am
US v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:23 am
Under United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm
App., 2006)US Supreme Court certiorari denied by Jones v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 11:10 am
We now answer 'no' to that question and, accordingly, affirm the district court. [read post]
