Search for: "Flores v. Flores" Results 441 - 460 of 1,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2008, 9:55 pm
Although both Agent Flores and Agent Hyland testified that Agent Flores asked everyone on the bus about his or her luggage, neither agent testified as to Defendant's response. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Flores (08-289) and Speaker of the Arizona House v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:01 pm by Kali Borkoski
Entertainment Merchants Association and Flores-Villar v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:40 am
Flores; Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 2:38 pm
” [Cite] Although I agree with the majority that “a word is known by the company it keeps,” Flores, 729 F.3d at 915, in my view, the rest of the terms in the statute—employs, persuades, induces, entices or coerces— suggest that the defendant must have exerted some sort of improper influence on the minor for the purpose of producing the visual depiction of sexual conduct.Whether that something more has been shown here is where I agree with my colleagues. [read post]
19 May 2010, 9:26 am by Dwight Sullivan
The granted issue in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:43 am by Kali Borkoski
  And at FeministLawProfessors.com, Jennifer Hendricks – following up on a question posed by Justice Scalia during Wednesday’s oral argument in Flores-Villar v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 8:01 pm
[This case summarized by Felicia Sarner.]US v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 3:55 am by Nathan Mattise
Prior legal precedent appeared split, but Defense Distributed attorney Chad Flores argued this case resembled Calder v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 10:05 pm by Kali Borkoski
Entertainment Merchants Association and Flores-Villar v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:36 am by Kali Borkoski
Entertainment Merchants Association and Flores-Villar v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 12:00 pm
After two decisions earlier this Term favoring non-citizens' interpretations of immigration-related statutes (Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]