Search for: "Foote v. Grant"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,643
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2021, 6:41 am
Lawrenceville Stakeholders v City of Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment, 2021 WL 836777 (PA Cmwlth 3/5/2021) [read post]
1 May 2014, 6:32 am
Some district courts applied a different definition for the Titles, but the Court of Appeals (Lohier, Sack and Straub) puts its foot down. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:15 am
Yesterday in American Humanist Association v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 4:08 am
Fender Musical Instruments Corporation v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:42 pm
In 2001, Legacy proposed a 270,500–square–foot building for office, restaurant, and bank use, along with the City library and YMCA, with an underground parking garage structure. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 4:40 pm
Cellco Partnership b/d/a Verizon Wireless v Town of Mesilla, 2021 WL 5578871 (D NM 11/29/2021) [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:52 pm
The City’s motion for summary judgment was therefore granted. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:27 pm
Most recently, in Murphy v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:30 am
" Ricciardello v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:58 pm
by Dennis Crouch The final group of amicus briefs were filed this past week in Oil States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 11:01 am
The case of Krock v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
Uselton v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
("We granted certiorari to resolve a Circuit conflict concerning the consequences of a Rule 11(c)(1) violation. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:13 pm
Helms, Zobrest v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 2:06 pm
In Alderman v J C Development Communities, LLC, 2009 Mich. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 10:02 am
Wexford Science and Technology, LLC v City of Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment, 2022 WL 3021692 (PA Cmwlth 8/1/2022) [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 5:18 am
He was able to avoid falling by bracing his foot against a piece of metal. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 5:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 2:06 pm
The fact that the injured party had nothing whatsoever to do with the recreational activity -- moreover, that he never even stepped a foot on (or even came near) the property -- is irrelevant, Justice Hull holds. [read post]