Search for: "Frank v. Frank" Results 441 - 460 of 7,039
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Ted Frank and Michael Krauss are covering the new Supreme Court decision in Riegel v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:50 am by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford The Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 11:14 am
Recently Barney Frank argued that Justice Antonin Scalia was a homophobe on the basis of two of Scalia's strongly worded dissenting opinions in Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:45 am by Dan Rodriguez
Frank Pasquale has provided an extraordinarily thoughtful, informed perspective on the "machine v. lawyers" debate, a topic my Northwestern colleague, John McGinnis, has discussed at length. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:21 pm by Orin Kerr
” Orozco then followed up with another argument regarding the merits of National Rifle Association v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:30 am by Charles A. Sullivan
Frank’s target is the notion that someone can’t be an employer and an employee at the same time, which explains why cases like Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:39 am by Workplace Prof
Franks; an ERISA decision involving the responsibilities of ESOP plan fiduciaries, Fifth Third v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 7:18 am
As Frank Snyder put it in the early days of this Blog:[On] December 2, 1980, the Missouri Court of Appeals decided Katz v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:23 am by Andrew Hamm
The transcript of oral argument in Frank v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by Ruthann Robson
Franks, the case involves a public employee's First Amendment rights in the context of retaliation and raising questions about the interpretation of Garcetti v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:46 am by Broc Romanek
The Dodd-Frank Act's "Needle in the Haystack": Resource Extraction Disclosure Now that we are all wading through the 2,000 pages of the Dodd-Frank Act (here is a Subtitle E excerpt if you just want to read the 23 pages related to governance and executive compensation - with exceptions that Sections 971 (proxy access) and 972 (Chair-CEO split) are in Subtitle G), members are finding some items they didn't expect. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 8:24 am by Microjuris PR
El abogado litigante en casos civiles y penales, tanto en el foro estatal como el federal, Frank Torres Viada, explica los detalles de este caso. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 3:39 am
Frank Church chose to protect our civil liberties and the Constitution in the face of Executive Branch abuse. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 7:16 am
Frank was probably referring to the SEC enforcement action in SEC v. [read post]