Search for: "French v. French" Results 441 - 460 of 4,750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
The Supreme Court chose to refer this question to the CJEU, which replied in a decision of the 26 February 2015 (C-41/14 – Christie’s France SNC v Syndicat national des antiquaries, see previous post here). [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 10:16 pm
Yes, that Renoir -- the French impressionist who made, inter alia, several $70 million-plus artworks.After all, Renoir was born in 1841, and died almost a century ago. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:55 am by INFORRM
In the case of Giesbert v France ([2017] ECHR 504, 1 June 2017)(French only) the Fifth Section of the Court of Human Rights held that Court orders made against the magazine, Le Point, sanctioning the publication of criminal court documents in the high profile “Bettancourt” case did not violate Article 10 of the Convention. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was Saurette c. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  It includes Beyond Backlash: Legal History, Polarization, and Roe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 2:13 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Although the English were outnumbered five to one, they went on to defeat the French at Agincourt. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 8:08 am by Frank Cranmer
In Aygün v Belgium [2022] ECHR 939 [in French], the applicants’ two sons had been murdered in September 2010 and in February 2014 a neighbour was convicted of their murder. [read post]
16 May 2024, 5:40 am by Frank Cranmer
In Mikyas and Others v Belgium [2024] No 50681/20 [In French], three young Muslim women complained that they were not allowed to wear the hijab at secondary schools except during religious education classes. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:23 pm by Team
On February 1st 2012, the application was communicated to the agent of the French Republic with questions to be answered within 16 weeks. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:45 am
Alternatively it's Wilo SE v Harmonisierungsamt für den Binnenmarkt (Marken, Muster und Modelle) (HABM). [read post]