Search for: "Frye v Frye"
Results 441 - 460
of 683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Frye [9] and Lafler v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:06 am
Critically and consequently, the Court ruled that the science behind urine testing was invalid and could not stand up to scientific scrutiny required under the Frye-Mack test (see Frye v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 2:41 am
Though Massachusetts courts do not use the Frye standard to measure the reliability of scientific evidence, the Supreme Judicial Court in Comonwealth. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 9:17 pm
That is the general rule, I believe, but the odd facts of Frye v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
” He determined that plaintiff’s submission concerning medical causation failed to meet the test under Frye v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:27 am
Frye looks at this story as an exemplar of the medieval perception of authorship. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
Frye, Martinez v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 2:54 am
In the case of Missouri v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 1:25 pm
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm
This would be a Scott v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:23 am
That hit a brick wall in a major new decision in Muhummad v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:30 am
Brian also reviews Wal-Mart v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
Frye Rehberg v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
Frye, Jon M. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:26 am
Frye, 10–444. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:26 pm
One was a Florida Supreme Court ruling in Charles v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:04 am
” These two articles, along with the recent New Hampshire Supreme Court decision in Baxter v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:26 pm
Prior to 1993, the determination of whether scientific evidence should be allowed followed the “Frye” method, so named for the 1923 case of Frye v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:39 am
Additional Resources: Gutierrez v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:23 pm
In recent appellate opinion, a catastrophic injury case, Yiallouro v. [read post]
