Search for: "G. G. v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 11,902
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2014, 12:16 am
Williams v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:40 pm
Alexandra G. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:57 am
The Supreme Court of Florida just issued an important decision (Perera v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:03 am
Justice Clarence Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 1:30 am
The case was decided by a vote of 6-3, with Chief Justice John G. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 6:53 am
[15] Thus, in Güzelyurtlu and Others v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 10:30 am
The University of Chicago no longer is in danger of losing ancient Iranian artifacts following Wednesday's United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Jenny Rubin, et al. v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 3:52 pm
" In today's U.S. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:52 am
Clayton, 2010 CAAF LEXIS 274 (March 17, 2010),* aff'g United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:17 pm
The case is called Greenberg v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 3:12 pm
On February 12, 2014, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Solvay S.A. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:46 am
The Example of X v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2021] EWHC 355 (Fam)) To illustrate the argument, I choose a UK case that enters into a direct dialogue with Susanne Gössl’s reflection about the notion of habitual residence (see post (2)). [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:04 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:06 pm
The version of 102(g) involved in this appeal states that: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless: ... [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 1:48 pm
G&W Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 7:04 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 2:30 pm
STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION/SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:47 am
Writing for the majority, Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that 18 USC § 3742(g)(2) [text], which barred judges from departing from federal sentencing guidelines [materials] when resentencing defendants, was nullified by the... [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:30 am
Entitlement to priority (A-III-6.1)Following G 1/22 (and G 2/22), A-III-6.1 has been updated to state "absent any substantiated indication to the contrary, there is a strong rebuttable presumption under the EPC that an applicant or joint applicants claiming priority in accordance with Art. 88(1) and Rule 52 are also entitled to the claimed priority. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:40 am
Case citation: Real v. [read post]
