Search for: "GARDNER v. GARDNER" Results 441 - 460 of 898
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Charon QC
The UK Human Rights blog reports: Supreme Court dismisses self-incrimination appeal Philips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 28 - read judgment. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:12 am by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court precedent is flatly contrary, see Jones v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm by Sam Murrant
It remains to be seen whether any of these “spy movie” strategies will be attempted – Gardner is skeptical that any of them would work, but one never truly knows with Assange. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm by Charon QC
” Natasha Phillips of Researching Reform writes: Government wants to end Blame Culture – By Blaming Others 11 KBW in Panopticon: Important new privacy judgment: police retention of protestor’s data not an Article 8 infringement The Admin Court (Gross LJ and Irwin J) has handed down judgment this week in Catt v Association of Chief Police Officers and Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 1471 (Admin). [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 12:40 am by Wessen Jazrawi
 For more detail on the reasoning in the judgment as well as on the re-opening of proceedings, see Carl Gardner’s post on Head of Legal. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:03 am
”** In addition, the employee’s failure to object to the absence of such written designation “is of no moment, inasmuch as this jurisdictional defect cannot be waived,” said the court, citing Gardner v Coxsackie-Athens Cent. [read post]
31 May 2012, 4:47 am by Rosalind English
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Abu Qatada appeal was in time but will not be heard by the Grand Chamber Time, time, time, look what’s become of me Abu Qatada and the law of time – Carl Gardner No deportation for Abu Qatada, but where are we now on torture evidence? [read post]
27 May 2012, 9:07 am by Wessen Jazrawi
In the courts Scoppola v Italy (No. 3) – 126/05 [2012] ECHR 868 (22 May 2012). [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:46 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Indeed, the UK must still allow at least some prisoners the vote, as required by the 2005 judgment in Hirst v UK (No.2) and the 2010 judgment in Greens & MT v UK. [read post]