Search for: "GIST v. GIST" Results 441 - 460 of 1,086
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2015, 4:22 am
Here in the Third Circuit, the courts seem to have taken a fairly insured-friendly approach:In Lasser v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 11:48 am by Wells Bennett
Such is the gist of a three-judge panel's quite important opinion, affirming the denial of a motion to dismiss in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:26 am
A very interesting debate on the Utah Supreme Court in Friday’s State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
    This, of course, is not a complete description of the requirements, but you get the gist. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:59 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Gist and Gist, Kennedy & Associates, Inc.Case Number: 13-cv-01833 (United States District Court for the Northen District of Georgia)Case Filed: May 31, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 1, 2015 6/30/15 9/28/15 2015-55 SEC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 11:52 am by Wells Bennett
Earlier today, a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit handed down its quite important decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 11:52 am by Wells Bennett
Earlier today, a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit handed down its quite important decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Well known examples of those who can make such a defence are the proprietors of libraries (Vizetelly v Mudie’s Select Library Limited) and newsvendors (Emmens v Pott [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  Rather, the court was more simply noting that, since Pennsylvania law in this regard was unsettled, it could not rule that the Plaintiff had failed to state a colorable claim under the motion to remand standard of review.The court also addressed gist of the action and statute of limitations issues relative to the negligence claim in a manner that favored the Plaintiff's position.The Plaintiff's UTPCPL claims were also found by the court to be colorable claims that… [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The case of Gulati v MGN Ltd [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch), to which the attention of this blog’s readers has already been drawn here, is a complex but important case. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
The gist of these decisions is that (1) as a constitutional matter, the records sought are protected by the 4th Amendment, and therefore a warrant based on probable cause is required to access them; and (2) as a statutory matter, the Stored Communications Act (`SCA’) does not authorize this type of request.In re Application for Cell Tower Records, supra. [read post]