Search for: "GRANT et al v. HOLDER et al"
Results 441 - 460
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:51 pm
For publication opinions today (2): In Board of Commissioners of LaPorte County, Board of Commissioners of Porter County, Town of Beverly Shores, et al v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Aukerman, et al Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitDAMON J. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:30 am
Plumtree Software, Inc., et al. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
THE CITY OF PALO ALTO et al., Defendants and Appellants. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 3:40 am
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966).5 Quanta Computer, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 2:14 pm
Dudas, et al. consolidated with Smithkline Beecham Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 7:08 pm
Apparently, however, this was not a use that would fall under any fair use analysis, according to the RIAA, et al, but simply a license they were granting to do so. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the claims of Beal Bank. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the claims of Beal Bank. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
Boyar & Miller, P.C. et al., No. 3:06-CV-1936-D (N.D. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 7:00 am
Section 11.182 of the Texas Tax Code allows such an exemption to a Community Housing Development Organization, or "CHDO", that is improving property for low-income and moderate-income (affordable) housing, but only if the CHDO "owns" the property in question.In TRQ Captain's Landing L.P., et al., v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
Miller, et al Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitCOBRA; EQUITABLE ESTOPPELBOGGS, Chief Judge. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:05 pm
Novartis Pharms. et al., No. 06-1181 (Fed. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 1:57 am
" 8A Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 2234 (2d ed.1994). [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
., et al., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
