Search for: "GRIFFITHS v. STATE"
Results 441 - 460
of 541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm
It marked the United States’ largest military campaign to date, involving 1.2 million soldiers of the American Expeditionary Force. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
See State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:58 pm
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v Hassan Abdi and Afrah Khalaf [2010] EWHC 3083 (Admin) The Court of Appeal decided that time spent appealing against deportation counts in assessing whether an individual has been detained for an unreasonably long period. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm
The first case is United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On 26 July 2022, there were hearings in Dyson v MGN Limited before Nicklin J and Smith -v- Baker and another before Griffiths J. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
In Simao v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm
On 17 June 2021, Griffiths J handed down judgment in the case of Webb v Jones [2021] EWHC 1618 (QB). [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am
Quick links Mateusz Wąsik, Strasbourg Observers: Przybyszewska and Others v. [read post]
1 Dec 2018, 8:03 am
However the right of the family court to take adverse inferences from an invocation of this privilege (see Griffith v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 9:43 pm
Morrison v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:51 pm
The best indication of the joint dissent’s misunderstanding of the Framers’ scheme is its treatment of Justice Story’s landmark 1820 opinion in a piracy case, United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 4:22 pm
Griffiths v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:53 am
(Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am
Last Week in the Courts On Monday 5 December 2022, Griffiths J heard the trial in the defamation case of ABC v Palmer (QB-2021-001857). [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 12:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:14 am
The government characterizes it as a factual question—one that (a) the military commission should answer in the first instance (which is why it argues for Councilman abstention), and (b) that can and should be made now in retrospect about the state of affairs in 2000. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 8:03 am
See Cooper v. [read post]
