Search for: "Gay v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 3,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2024, 10:47 am
In the case of Dausab v The Minister of Justice, applicant Friedel Dausab, a Namibian gay man working as an LGBTQ rights activist, stated that he endured hardship by openly living as a gay man. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:11 am
The change to the FMLA policy would come after United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:20 pm
Loeffenholz v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 7:06 pm
The state Supreme Court put more questions to the lawyers in the to-allow-gay-marriage-or-not litigation today, asking for more briefing before the typical rounds are even complete. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 10:41 pm
Gay, 471 F.3d 469 (3rd Cir. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 11:40 am
In 2003, the Supreme Court declared state laws against consensual sodomy by same-sex couples to be unconstitutional, in Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 9:26 am
While most states consider jury deliberations to be private, in its 2017 Pena-Rodriquez v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:30 am
Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston and Wooley v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 3:09 am
Gay, 466 F.3d 276 (3d Cir. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
Hardwick stood as a precedent, blocking progress on gay rights in the federal courts, until it was overruled in 2003 in Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 3:54 am
The shop owner's refusal was based on his sincerely held religious beliefs against gay marriage.We've seen these cake cases percolating through the legal systems of various states for the past half decade. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 8:06 pm
Surrogate Nahman reasoned that “the validity of same-sex marriages has not been definitively determined by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department (see Funderburke v New York State Dep’t. of Civ. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:27 pm
Kennedy wrote Romer v Evans (striking down a ballot measure broadly banning gay civil rights protections); Lawrence v Texas (striking down a criminal ban on consensual sodomy); United States v Windsor (striking down the federal Defense of Marriage Act); and Obergefell v Hodges (striking down bans on same sex marriage). [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:31 am
The controversy has inspired others to propose a more sweeping reform than Robinson's, in which the state would continue to recognize all the rights, duties, and benefits of marriage, except in name. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 2:18 pm
Morrison, Attorney General v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:10 am
From SSRN:David Grenardo, How A Person of Faith Can Address Imposter Syndrome in Law School, (Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, Considerations, Forthcoming 2023).Hilary Hogan, The Right to Life and The State’s Investigative Obligations: Fox v Minister for Justice, (November 15, 2022).Andrew Coan, What Is the Matter with Dobbs? [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:23 pm
Supreme Court, in its divided 5-4 decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 8:40 am
Fifty-five years later, the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:45 am
The next big thing on the horizon in same sex rights in Texas will be the Texas Supreme Court’s opinions in In re J.B. and H.B. and State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:39 pm
Cal.) issued his ruling in Perry v. [read post]
