Search for: "General Binding Corporation" Results 441 - 460 of 2,620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2008, 5:15 am
  Instead of the SEC excluding these proposals, he argues, let the Delaware courts sort them out and determine whether they interfere with the board's duties under Section 141 of the General Corporation Law. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm
(This is also why, by the way, I think the ‘unwilling or unable’ formulation generally applied to States from the Global South, in terms of the ability to provide remediation locally, is misplaced and patronising. [read post]
8 May 2007, 11:51 am
I suspect that the Commission currently is moving toward removing federal restrictions on binding shareholder proposals except for validity under state law. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 1:23 pm by Matthew Dochnal
In contrast, a company forming a Special Purpose Vehicle often binds the SPV to a limited purpose clause. [read post]
10 May 2016, 1:08 pm by Melinda L. McLellan and Jenna N. Felz
The invalidation of the Safe Harbor left thousands of companies in search of alternatives to meet their cross-border data transfer needs, and introduced new uncertainty regarding the long-term sustainability of other mechanisms such as binding corporate rules and model clauses. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 12:00 am by Kasia Parecki
Dorian argued, while the Shareholder proposal was binding on the board and the earlier proposal was not, proposals need not be identical for the Shareholder proposal to qualify for exemption under the rule. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 1:15 pm
The outcome is binding, and there is generally no right to an appeal. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:25 am by TIMDWGCD48013
Lawyers are put in a secrecy bind. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:25 am by TIMDWGCD48013
Lawyers are put in a secrecy bind. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:25 am by TIMDWGCD48013
Lawyers are put in a secrecy bind. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:28 am by Ron Coleman
Oh, just a general binding corporation. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 4:02 pm by Ron Coleman
Oh, just a general binding corporation. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 6:50 pm
It is clear that any extension agreement executed by GG would bind only GG in reviving the Statute of Limitations, and, thus, only insofar as GG may have rights in the property does the action appear to have any foundation. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 10:51 am by Brandon Storm
The Murray Energy Corporation claimed the proposed new rule posed a conflict with another section of the Clean Air Act. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:41 am
In contrast, Europe is commonly thought to be a consistent supporter of multilateralism and of legally binding environmental agreements. [read post]
State Department did not consider the 1966 Pine Gap Agreement and the General Security Agreement to be binding international agreements. [read post]