Search for: "German v. United States"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2013, 12:03 pm
Today I was in Mannheim for an IPCom v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:45 am
A/AC.96/1222 (UN General Assembly, July 2022) [text]"Race, Borders, and Jurisdiction," Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, vol. 82, no. 2 (2022) [open access]"Rejection at the Frontier and Human Rights: The UN Treaty Bodies and European Practice," Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, vol. 82, no. 2 (2022) [open access]"'Time' in Refugee… [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:58 am
In Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2012 WL 1367534 (M.D.Fla.) [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 4:57 pm
When counsel stated that the leak problem had begun in 2007, Justice Thomas asked why the defendant hadn't sued then. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
German-based Products 4U made and sold, inter alia, accessories forWintersteiger's tools. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 12:30 am
The article was about a criminal investigation in the United States into a company owned by a former New York City mayoral candidate who was alleged to have bribed Ukrainian officials to obtain a television licence. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
In the Microsoft case it was key that the FRAND contract case had been brought in the United States approximately eight months before Motorola filed the related German lawsuits, and Motorola had offered, in a letter sent from Illinois to Washington State in 2010, a worldwide license covering its declared-essential H.264 and IEEE 802.11 patents, also listing the European counterparts of the relevant U.S. patents. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm
It marked the United States’ largest military campaign to date, involving 1.2 million soldiers of the American Expeditionary Force. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 2:28 pm
The German measures in question were not deigned to regulate trade between Germany and other member States. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Our decision applies only to [cameras] for which the United States patent right has been exhausted by first sale in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Our decision applies only to [cameras] for which the United States patent right has been exhausted by first sale in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Our decision applies only to [cameras] for which the United States patent right has been exhausted by first sale in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
The text limits and directs government and future lawmaking, with the United States offering the paradigm example. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 11:23 am
In Westfield v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Bauman, et al. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 11:07 am
Now consider the recent case of Stübing v Germany. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
Lingering Doubts, Trade Secrets and Copyright PreemptionMike Mireles explores the overlapping IP rights that protect software in the United States.Patentability of user interface designs - Part 2 of 2: the German approach Mark Schweizer analyses the case law from the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH) and compares the German and EPO approaches to patentability of user interface designs. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Torre — German Discovery Rejected; Many Claims Dismissed Under Morrison (0) Ninth Circuit Refuses To Permit Case Involving Peppercorns and Trochus Buttons To Proceed Against the Sovereign State of Pohnpei (0) Morrison v. [read post]
