Search for: "Givens v. Clarke"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,332
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2017, 5:30 am
As the Court of Appeal in Vescovi v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:14 am
Kurtz v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 6:34 am
Non-monetary remedies are often as important, if not more, than damages, as was made clear by Tugendhat J in Clarke v Bain [2008] EWHC 2636 (QB): “Defamation actions are not primarily about recovering money damages, but about vindication of a claimant’s reputation. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
In a separate opinion (with which I agree) Lady Clark rejects an argument that there are insufficient relevant averments of any loss suffered by the pursuer (HC). [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
The first is Packingham v. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Clark v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:07 pm
There was no staff on the premises, or statutory duty, unlike Westminster CC v Clarke (1992) 2AC 288. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
Yesterday evening, the court asked both sides in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 4:31 pm
This post originally appeared on the Osborne Clarke website and is reproduced with permission and thanks. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:26 pm
Since then Listeria has been implicated in many outbreaks of food-borne illness, most commonly from exposure to contaminated dairy products and prepared meat products, including turkey and deli meats, pâté, hot dogs and seafood and fish. [4] Given its widespread presence in the environment and food supply, the ingestion of Listeria has been described as an “exceedingly common occurrence. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 5:01 am
One answer can be found in a recent case, Walker v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:38 am
Utah v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:10 pm
2000); Clark, 22 F.3d at 801‐02; McKinnon, 985 F.2d at 527–28; United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:54 pm
Interestingly, oral arguments Washington v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:54 pm
Interestingly, oral arguments Washington v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:03 am
Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
In April 2016, permission was given for the claim to be expanded to cover the sale of gels as well. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Court of Appeal decision In overturning the decision of first instance, Lord Justice Clark (with whom Lady Justice Gloster and Lord Justice Patten agreed) relied on the following reasons: In reviewing the case law regarding contractual interpretation (Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36 and Gan Insurance Co Ltd v Tai Ping Insurance Co Ltd [2001] CLC 1, 103 being particularly significant) it can be said that “the clearer the language the less appropriate it may be to… [read post]
