Search for: "Grant v. United States of America"
Results 441 - 460
of 3,161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
(Backer, Tweaking Facts, Speaking Judgment: Judicial Transmogrification of Case Narrative as Jurisprudence in the United States and Britain, Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 6:611, 616 (1998).)This insight may help untangle some of the discursive trajectories in the case and the declaraitons. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 10:37 pm
For instance, the Microsoft v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 9:03 am
Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets MARCH 9, 2022 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
Please rise if you are able and show that, Yes, we the United States of America stand with the Ukrainian people. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm
Following the United States Supreme Court’s twisted rulings in Baze v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:31 am
The Secretary of State had a duty to act in conformity with that order, and his failure to do so was unlawful. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
United States metastasized into a massive system restraining the speech of millions. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In March 2021, the court invited the U.S. solicitor general to file a brief expressing the United States’ view on whether to grant cert. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm
United States On 31 January 2022, the EARN IT Act was reintroduced to the Senate by Senator Richard Blumenthal and 18 co-sponsors from both parties. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
But even if a state legislature were to adopt this misguided measure, Bush v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 6:22 am
Here: Cert Petition Questions presented: Whether the Trial Court and the Court of Appeals committed prejudicial error in barring/blocking a Native American tribe from pursuing in rem / quiet title remedies on lands promised and granted to them by the USA from that tribe, but stolen by another tribe based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to the non-justiciable political question doctrine.Whether or not, the Court committed prejudicial error by blocking a native American… [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
But in Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am
Zhong as inventors and as applicants with designation for the United States of America (US) only. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:51 pm
" (emphasis added)My #1 wish was granted--I just didn't know it when I wrote the above sentence :-)The Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice, speaking on behalf of the United States of America, has filed the following brief, formally in support of neither party but practically supporting some of the most important elements of Epic's appeal (this post continues below the document):22-01-27 United… [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 1:42 pm
BMW of North America, LLC et al – United States District Court – Northern District of Ohio – January 24th, 2022) involves a products liability claim against BMW. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
Many people excluded from the United States because of the Muslim ban, such as those who received a once-in-a-lifetime immigration visa via the “diversity lottery,” have still not been admitted. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:06 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar… [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in DHS v. [read post]