Search for: "Green v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 6,587
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2009, 4:11 pm
” The out-of-state defendant must “purposefully avail itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum state,” thus creating a substantial connection with the forum state. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 9:48 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Department of State (“DOS”) has now issued FAQs for handling of same-sex spouses in both the immigrant (green card) and nonimmigrant (temporary visa) categories, following the Supreme Court’s finding, in Windsor v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 10:36 am
Today, the  United States Supreme Court granted a cert petition in Stolt-Nielsen S.A., et al., v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Dan Stein
The Supreme Court has decided to review certain elements in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 8:32 am by Amanda M. Sample and Ellen T. Berge
Last month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California attempted to tackle these questions in response to a motion to dismiss in Della v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 11:53 am by MBettman
On June 10, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:00 am by Scott Wolfe Jr
   Now…Louisiana will likely have to wait and see how the Obama / California v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 9:17 pm by Patent Docs
The Center for Innovation Policy at Duke Law will be hosting a conference entitled "Is Administrative Review of Granted Patents Constitutional? [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:59 am by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Cleveland, Ohio, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:05 pm by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Dayton, Ohio, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:38 pm by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Cleveland, Ohio, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]