Search for: "HALE v. STATE"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,075
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2016, 6:40 am
State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
” (slip op. at 23-24) (citing Strickland and United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
’ The Rt Hon Sir Jack Beatson FBA, ‘The New Model Judiciary and the Other Two Branches of State’ The Hon Justice Mark Leeming, ‘Ministerial Override Certificates and the Law/Fact Distinction – A Comparison Between Australia and the United Kingdom’ Philip Cayford QC, ‘Wyatt v Vince – Climate Change in the Family Division? [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am
That was the difficult question the Supreme Court had to grapple with in the case of R(C) v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:36 am
Lady Hale gave the only substantive judgment. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 8:36 am
A majority of the Supreme Court (Lady Hale dissenting) dismissed the appeal. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
A.S. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 9:46 pm
Hale v City of Minot, 2015 ND 216, 868 N.W.2d 870 (8/25/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20140337.htm Filed under: Building Codes, Current Caselaw, Senior Housing [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:01 am
Hyatt, in which the Court is considering whether a state agency can be haled into another state’s courts against its will, comes from Lyle Denniston for this blog, with commentary from Jessica Berch and Chad DeVeaux at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:33 pm
One heard frequently about how the states, fretting over being haled into court to pay off their debts from the Revolutionary War, wanted assurances that that would not happen. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am
Hyatt, in which the Court will consider whether a state agency can be haled into another state’s courts against its will. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:45 am
On 23 November 2015 the Supreme Court heard a two day appeal of the decision in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 1608. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:34 pm
A California state agency, supported by most of the other states, is trying to persuade the Supreme Court to immunize states from being haled into other states’ courts, against their will. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 5:53 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 3:25 am
For these reasons the Court said that the Secretary of State would likely need to redraft her guidance, and in particular the provisions for exceptionally disapplying the rule. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am
Lady Hale would have allowed the appeal under the Wednesbury challenge. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:08 am
However she stated since this was not a remedy sought by the appellants the Court should invite further submissions before finally deciding the outcome of the appeal. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
