Search for: "HARTNESS v. STATE" Results 441 - 460 of 1,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:28 pm by Tobias Lutzi
The volume on The Common Law Jurisprudence of the Conflict of Laws, edited by Sarah McKibbin (University of Southern Queensland) and Anthony Kennedy (Serle Court), recently published by Hart, does just that, by discussing cases like Vita Food Products, Brook v Brook, Bonython v Commonwealth of Australia, AG v Heinemann Publishers (better known as the Australian Spycatcher case), Bremen v Zapata, Vizcaya v Picard, and Kuwait Airways (Nos 4 and 5).… [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
Text of the complaint and the proposed consent decree in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 7:20 am by Mark Ashton
 A similar case involving a frustrated permit to build a dam is found in Hart v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 7:08 am by Joy Waltemath
Left unaddressed by the court below, and thus the state high court, was whether the state uniformity law was constitutional (Protect Fayetteville fka Repeal 119 v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:10 pm
On July 30, 2009, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled against convicted peace protestors in Tataz, et al. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:49 pm by David Ettinger
The cases (and the issues presented, as stated on the court’s website) that will be argued in January are: Quarry v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:22 am by Ken Kersch
publication of this classic book (Foundation Press, 2001), although highly influential through its use as a classroom text at Harvard Law School, and passed around in (unpublished) manuscript form, the authors simply couldn’t bring themselves to publish this book because, anchored as it was in the structural/process liberalism of the new administrative state, it had almost nothing to say about Brown v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
In the United Kingdom and other Council of Europe member states, following the 1981 decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Dudgeon v. [read post]