Search for: "Hale v. Hale" Results 441 - 460 of 1,469
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2017, 2:58 pm by sarahjaneewart
The dissenting judgments of Baroness Hale and Lord Kerr offer some hope to campaigners, and the appellants will take their case to Strasbourg (despite the earlier case of A, B and C v Ireland, which held that Article 8 rights cannot be interpreted as providing a right to an abortion). [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:55 am by Jonathan Metzer
Lord Wilson, with whom Lady Hale, Lord Hodge and Lord Toulson agreed, held that in order for article 8 to be effective the appellants needed the opportunity to bring their appeals against deportation from within the UK. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:01 am by Ed Arnold, CMS
On 27 and 28 March 2017, the Supreme Court heard the appeal of R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor & Another in which it considered whether the order imposing fees in the employment tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal is indirectly discriminatory and whether it breaches the EU principle of effectiveness. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:25 am
Proxy Season Half-Time Update Posted by John Roe, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., on Wednesday, May 31, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Disclosure, ESG, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Say on frequency, Say on pay, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Sustainability What’s (Still) Wrong with Credit Ratings Posted by Frank Partnoy, University of San Diego, on Wednesday, May 31, 2017 Tags: Accountability, Credit risk, Defaults, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial… [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Clarke and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm by Giles Peaker
Instead the Chamber concentrated its attention on two admittedly obiter statements, respectively by Hale LJ (as she then was) in the Court of Appeal in Adan, and Lord Millett in Runa Begum. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:05 am by CLAIRE DARWIN, MATRIX
‘The law on discrimination ought to be easy’, declared Lady Hale giving judgment on behalf of the Supreme Court in Essop v Home Office and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27. [read post]
6 May 2017, 12:00 am by Robert L. Mues
 Here it is: “RECENT RESEARCH: SHARED PARENTING VERSUS SINGLE PARENTING Shared Parenting Data In December, 2016, The American Psychological Association published research by William V. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:09 am by ASAD KHAN
Lady Hale and Lords Wilson, Carnwath, Hodge and Toulson recently heard these appeals and reserved judgment on the issue whether section 94B of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 complies with the procedural and substantive protections under ECHR, article 8. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:09 am by ASAD KHAN
Comment At the close of proceedings, Lady Hale reassured everyone that the justices “don’t underestimate the importance of the issues” in the instant appeals. [read post]