Search for: "Hales v State"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,080
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2016, 4:56 pm
As for the competing Convention rights (the family’s Article 8 rights to privacy and the importance of free press reporting under Article 10), the judge relied upon the ruling of the Supreme Court in R(C) v Secretary of State for Justice ([2016] UKSC 2) where Lady Hale observed: “First, neither article has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 12:09 pm
They asked the Court to declare that one state cannot be haled into the courts of another state to answer for its official actions back home. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:37 am
The court held that Nevada cannot refuse to extend to other states haled into Nevada courts the same immunities Nevada enjoys without violating the constitutional Full Faith and Credit Clause [text]. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:26 pm
A traditional trust is not a distinct legal entity at all, but rather a “fiduciary relationship” that could not be haled into court. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:01 pm
Here’s a nice personal jurisdiction decision (TV Azteca v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:22 am
They stated that the Court had no hesitation in concluding that it should do so in the present case. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 6:40 am
State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
” (slip op. at 23-24) (citing Strickland and United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
’ The Rt Hon Sir Jack Beatson FBA, ‘The New Model Judiciary and the Other Two Branches of State’ The Hon Justice Mark Leeming, ‘Ministerial Override Certificates and the Law/Fact Distinction – A Comparison Between Australia and the United Kingdom’ Philip Cayford QC, ‘Wyatt v Vince – Climate Change in the Family Division? [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am
That was the difficult question the Supreme Court had to grapple with in the case of R(C) v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:36 am
Lady Hale gave the only substantive judgment. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 8:36 am
A majority of the Supreme Court (Lady Hale dissenting) dismissed the appeal. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
A.S. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 9:46 pm
Hale v City of Minot, 2015 ND 216, 868 N.W.2d 870 (8/25/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20140337.htm Filed under: Building Codes, Current Caselaw, Senior Housing [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:01 am
Hyatt, in which the Court is considering whether a state agency can be haled into another state’s courts against its will, comes from Lyle Denniston for this blog, with commentary from Jessica Berch and Chad DeVeaux at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:33 pm
One heard frequently about how the states, fretting over being haled into court to pay off their debts from the Revolutionary War, wanted assurances that that would not happen. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am
Hyatt, in which the Court will consider whether a state agency can be haled into another state’s courts against its will. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:45 am
On 23 November 2015 the Supreme Court heard a two day appeal of the decision in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 1608. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:34 pm
A California state agency, supported by most of the other states, is trying to persuade the Supreme Court to immunize states from being haled into other states’ courts, against their will. [read post]
