Search for: "Handy v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2017, 4:13 pm
Two years after the Katz decision, in the case of Smith v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 3:30 am
Exhibit A in that regard is Riches v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:55 am
Finally Matt addressed industrial applicability, there being a new case to cite in Eli Lilly v Human Genome Sciences Inc, as well as a string of perpetual motion machines. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
There's also a neat Current Intelligence note by the perceptive Enrico Bonadio (City Law School, London) on the Advocate General's Opinion on what counts as "communication to the public" in the joined cases of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, YouTube and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08), which the Court of Justice is going to decide this summer. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 11:16 pm
A VGA adapter proved quite handy. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:14 am
Once again the state-law parallel is elusive. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:34 am
Similarly in, Quinlan v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 10:55 pm
Throwing in the useful case of Regina v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 3:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Instead, just include it loose, together with a completed form 1040-V (downloads as a pdf) in your envelope. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:31 am
Supreme Court ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:31 pm
Other outspoken opponents of trade agreements such as Phil Hare, Zack Space, and Joe Sestak lost.Murphy provides a handy tally of the protectionist losers here. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:19 am
(If you’re not sure whether you need to file, check out this handy post.) [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 2:50 pm
“2019 was a big deal for Accessibility, after the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s dismissal of Robles v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Walling v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
Whether the Courts will agree may be another matter, which may get addressed in judicial review of this decision and perhaps much sooner in the AC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
Hassel v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 10:50 am
The court also discusses the United State Supreme Court’s holding in J.D.B. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Fortunately the IPKat has been able to count on this handy analysis by Laura Thompson (Lexis PSL IP & IT team). [read post]
