Search for: "Harper v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2023, 9:14 am
Harper, the Court considered a contentious elections law dispute involving how much oversight state courts may exercise over federal elections. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 3:00 am
In it, Harper collects and discusses current copyright issues. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm
After the amendment’s ratification, Harper v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
It is for this reason that the doctrine fell out of favor with the Rehnquist Court and was essentially abandoned in the mid-1990s (Justice Thomas penning its demise in Harper v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:54 am
Harper twist. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 9:48 am
Pepe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 9:48 am
Pepe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 6:02 am
A new Texas appellate decision, Inliner Americas v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 6:31 pm
I was informed by Steve Harper of ICLE in Georgia that over 450 attorneys were in attendance, the largest crowd ever to attend. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:08 am
(On August 4, 1961, in Dixon v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:53 pm
United States and Trumbo v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:53 am
Harper despite a very plausible argument that the case was moot. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:45 am
People of the State of New York U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:03 pm
Additional Resources: Kengerski v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Harper, the Court rejected the “independent state legislature theory,” which maintains that state legislatures have exclusive authority to regulate federal elections. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:14 am
Some of the cards included in the packs are a 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle, a 1972 Carlton Fisk rookie, a 2001 Albert Pujols rookie, as well as cards autographed by teenage phenom Bryce Harper. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
— The Supreme Court is considering a cert petition in Genius v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 11:44 am
Harper v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:03 am
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
