Search for: "Health Plan Holdings, Inc." Results 441 - 460 of 1,687
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 13 January 2020 F L Meyers J handed down judgment in the case of Theralase Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 10 conference) Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 7:51 am
Holding: On appeal, the circuit court must review the district court’s factual determinations for clear error and legal conclusions de novo. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by News Desk
The warning letter says that, “As a result of these violations, the raw pet foods manufactured in your facility are adulterated in that they were prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby they may have been rendered injurious to health. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 10:35 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The $65,000 payment and corrective action plan commitments West Georgia Ambulance, Inc. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
ICHRAs are a significant development in health benefit planning. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:03 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 This Office will continue to hold accountable those who put at risk people’s health and safety just to turn a profit. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:13 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
§ 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) requires a covered entity to conduct an accurate and thorough assessment of the potential risks and vulnerabilities to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of ePHI it holds. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm by News Desk
§ 342(a)(4)], in that it was prepared, packed or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:20 pm by Jon L. Gelman
This litigation included multiple hearings before the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and the Court of Appeals to affirm Altor’s violations of OSHA’s safety requirements, and subsequently hold the employer and its president in civil contempt for failure to pay the affirmed penalty. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Megan Engel
  The case involves questions regarding how to interpret and apply the FCA’s materiality standard set forth in the Supreme Court’s decision in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]