Search for: "Henderson v State" Results 441 - 460 of 1,180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2015, 12:24 pm by Giles Peaker
He had pursued a crusade against Mr Gopee which was entirely unjustified. ii) As a result Mr Gopee and his associated companies have been and will be continued to be deprived of their right to a fair trial contrary to the Human Rights Act 1998 if all the actions are dealt with by HHJ Mackie. iii) HHJ Mackie had disregarded the changes in legislation to the Consumer Credit Act 1974. iv) HHJ Mackie had wrongly reopened past cases without regard to authorities such as Henderson v… [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:29 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge Henderson filed a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part (HealthBridge Management LLC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Quick answer: no” [David Henderson; WSJ/@scottlincicome on seasonal pool-supply company] Hillary Clinton and the Market Basket Stores myth [James Taranto] Labor Department proposes tightening regulation of retirement financial advisers [Kenneth Bentsen, The Hill] Proposed: “well-orchestrated” state ballot initiatives aimed at overturning employment at will [Rand Wilson, Workplace Fairness] My view: “Everybody wins with at-will employment” [Ethan… [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 10:46 am
At oral argument in the Supreme Court’s most recent Origination Clause case some years ago, United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:37 am by David DePaolo
He discounted my concerns however, stating he would be awake the entire flight despite my opinion that altitude would deprive his brain of oxygen, already challenged by the prior night's activities.I should have know something was up when we jumped the cab and the driver didn't know where Henderson Executive Airport was - oh boy...We eventually made it to the airport, the long way due to the cabbie's reliance on unreliable GPS, and after a careful pre-flight we were… [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:09 am by Zoe Bedell
Circuit handed down its decision in the most recent iteration of Al Bahlul v. [read post]