Search for: "Hernandez v. District Court"
Results 441 - 460
of 660
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2012, 3:25 pm
* Use immunity The question of compelling a public officer or employee to testify or risk termination was considered by the Court of Appeals Matt v LaRocca, 71 NY2d 154. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:30 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:11 am
The case is being prosecuted in the Somerville District Court. [read post]
28 May 2012, 10:09 am
In other Padilla retroactivity news, the Supreme Court of Florida recently heard oral arguments in its own Padilla retroactivity case, Hernandez v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 5:58 pm
adidas America, Inc. et al v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:20 pm
Blood v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 11:24 am
Blood v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:40 pm
—Texarkana 2008, pet. denied) (citing Hernandez v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
The district court denied Hernandez’ motion to suppress the statements. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:04 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Portland Division recently published its opinion in the case of Oregon State Bar Professional Liability Fund v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:13 am
Drawing by Patrick Finney The concept of bad facts making bad law struck again with United States District Court Judge Marco A. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:15 pm
" Citing the Eastern District of New York's ruling in Hernandez v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:21 am
State, 358 So. 2d 183, 185 (Fla. 1978); Hernandez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:01 pm
The court disagreed after applying the Supreme Court’s guidance from Corley v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:21 am
Tuesday's Supreme Court ruling in Martinez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 10:34 am
" The appellate judge in Hernandez v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:15 am
The district court then granted summary judgment to the Hernandez defendants, and Blood appealed. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:37 pm
Unfortunately, that's the situation Melinda Hernandez found herself in United States v. [read post]
CA11: Damage to door in attempt to enter, without entry, is de minimus for Fourth Amendment purposes
28 Jan 2012, 9:15 pm
In a pro se § 1983 case over an officer allegedly banging on and kicking a door to the point of damaging it to get access, but did not get access, the court agrees with the district court that there was no seizure or interference with liberty. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 7:18 am
The Oregon district court might add to the increasing judicial dialogue on legal protections for bloggers. [read post]
