Search for: "Herring v. Reed" Results 441 - 460 of 1,096
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2017, 8:50 am by Ken White
Third, the Supreme Court recently upended (or clarified, if you prefer) some First Amendment precedent in a case called Reed v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:34 am by MATHEW PURCHASE
The majority (Lords Neuberger, Toulson, Reed and Sumption) held that it was not reasonable to expect a more peremptory notice. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  After Butler’s conviction in 2016, relevant judgments in the family court were made public but it proved impossible for non-accredited journalists to check the terms of the reporting restrictions without making a potentially expensive application to the court, as the barrister Lucy Reed documented on her blog. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
AB v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Scotland), heard on 11 July 2016. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
The BBC Online report about the re-hearing court decision not to move a 2 year old to her grandparents, from her potential adopters where she had been settled for most of her young life. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
 Lord Reed refers to the position that EU law is the law of the land and the prerogative cannot be used to alter that. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:00 am by Jack Ballantyne, Olswang LLP
Lady Hale Lady Hale is renowned for her strident liberal and humanitarian views. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 6:00 am by Aidan Wills
The appeal was heard by Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Reed, Hughes and Dyson; a video recording of the hearing is available here. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lord Kerr and Lord Reed. [read post]
Following an appeal heard on 5 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down judgment on 13 July in the case of Edwards v Kumarasamy. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:20 am by Clare Montgomery QC, Matrix
Lords Hope and Rodger wrote the two main judgments in the Supreme Court overruling the unanimous decision of the seven-member Appeal Court in HM Advocate v McLean [2009] HCJAC 97, 2010 SLT 73. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm by Jared Beck
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:51 pm by Peter Margulies
The best indication of the joint dissent’s misunderstanding of the Framers’ scheme is its treatment of Justice Story’s landmark 1820 opinion in a piracy case, United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 6:39 am by Helen Klein Murillo, Alex Loomis
  Henderson Judge Henderson issued a short concurring opinion “incorporat[ing] by reference” her dissent in the Bahlul panel decision. [read post]