Search for: "High v State"
Results 441 - 460
of 35,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2016, 4:16 am
As readers have no doubt not forgotten, an eight Justice Court is weighing the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
The same constitutional challenge was made in 2014 in State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:36 am
Alas, the court kept its powder dry keeping out of the gun battle that would have been Williams v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Particular regard was given to the case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439, where it was held that allowing an extradition of a party to the United States would constitute a violation of that person’s Article 3 rights, as he would be exposed to the risk of the application of the death penalty as a direct consequence of the extradition. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 5:01 am
Joseph case, the scope of the collateral order doctrine had been limited to one very unusual situation, involving trial court orders permitting the deposition of high government decision makers.The Court found none of the exceptions to apply in this case, noting that if Addison's arguments were adopted, many discovery disputes would be entitled to interlocutory appeal, a result counter to the stated formulation of the collateral order doctrine under Maryland law. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:07 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:05 am
State of U.P. and Another, (Allahabad High Court, Nov. 11, 2020). [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
” The high court also expressly repudiated Dayton v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:14 am
High School Activities Ass’n. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 2:18 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Green v Bramston & Ors [2010] EWHC 3106 (Ch) (02 December 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Razai & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 3151 (Admin) (02 December 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 2:02 am
High Court (Chancery Division) NHS Business Services Authority v Ingram [2009] EWHC 2486 (Ch) (12 October 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Anam v Secretary of the State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 2496 (Admin) (13 October 2009) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:16 am
The state high court’s ruling in this asbestos injury lawsuit involved something called the “sophisticated intermediary doctrine. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
Reece v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:49 am
On June 30, 2020, the New Jersey Supreme Court reversed the Appellate Division in Gourmet Dining, LLC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:49 am
On June 30, 2020, the New Jersey Supreme Court reversed the Appellate Division in Gourmet Dining, LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 1:52 am
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court will consider Wednesday when doctors can provide abortions during medical emergencies in states with bans enacted after the high court’s sweeping decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:40 am
In Blair v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:38 pm
Case: Health World Ltd v Shin-Sun Australia Pty Ltd [2010] HCA 13.This appeal to the High Court is connected with Section 88(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1995. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:57 pm
Therefore, s.12(3) HRA (which states there must be no relief that would restrain publication which would affect the exercise of an ECHR right, unless the applicant is likely to establish that publication should not be allowed) was not satisfied, and interim relief could be granted.Whether it should be granted depended ultimately on the balance of convenience. [read post]
