Search for: "Hill v. Board of Review" Results 441 - 460 of 738
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am by Ronald Collins
Morgan Hill Unified School District); A commercial speech tour-guide licensing case (Kagan v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
NLRB to brass: please don’t sell workplace data to telemarketers or use it to “harass” or “rob” employees [Joe Perticone, IJ Review] “Direct evidence must … wait for it … exist to matter in a discrimination case” [Jon Hyman on Butler v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:27 am by Sebastian Brady
The Hill notes that the move precludes the addition of amendments to the bill, thus heading off the potential for controversial additions which might sink the proposal altogether. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm by Brian E. Barreira
  Even though M.G.L. c. 118E, s. 48 provides that the Director of the Board of Hearings “shall be responsible …for the training of referees,” it is unknown to the elder law bar whether such training has occurred regarding the details of federal Medicaid trust law, so hearing officers at the Board of Hearings may have been and may still be susceptible to being misled by the MassHealth Essay. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm by Brian E. Barreira
  Even though M.G.L. c. 118E, s. 48 provides that the Director of the Board of Hearings “shall be responsible …for the training of referees,” it is unknown to the elder law bar whether such training has occurred regarding the details of federal Medicaid trust law, so hearing officers at the Board of Hearings may have been and may still be susceptible to being misled by the MassHealth Essay. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:47 pm by Lyle Denniston
  As a result of the latest denial of review in the case of Bronx Household of Faith v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:05 am by Amy Howe
In The Huffington Post, Sam Stein suggests that, after a review of numerous public records relating to the tax subsidies at issue in King v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In Eldridge v British Columbia, the Court found that the failure of hospitals to provide sign-language services for hearing-impaired patients was a violation of section 15. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At The Hill, Ralph Tyler predicts that in King v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
Board of Education. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am by Arthur F. Coon
” The project’s geotechnical engineer, Alan Kropp, disagreed, asserting he had conducted the necessary investigations and found no landslide hazard and that Karp had materially misread the project plans in raising “side-hill fill” concerns, when no such fill would occur. [read post]