Search for: "Holder v. Smith"
Results 441 - 460
of 500
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Holder that discriminating against a person who has transitioned from one sex to the other or who assumes an appearance contrary to birth sex is a form of sex discrimination. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am
Arizona in Dickerson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 7:40 am
" Radiance Found., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
This risk is most pertinent for controlled public corporations, although it has also affected public and private corporations with significant non-majority holders. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:52 pm
Electronic Corp. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
As IPKat explains, Kelis is not the rights holder of the song: her problem is with her producers, not Beyoncé. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 11:49 pm
Smith, 162 Cal. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:48 pm
Tanvir, are U.S. citizens or green card holders. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:21 pm
After a gruelling 12-hour day at INTA yesterday, the AmeriKat was refreshed this morning with a delicious breakfast frittata in the fabulous company of friends from Reed Smith and one of her partners. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm
(Zelig v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
Their views appear to greatly differ from those of Bebchuk's, who proposes allowing shareholders to alter "rules-of-the-game" decisions or else elect a new team of directors who will.[3] This report will use Bainbridge, Blair and Stout's theories in support of an amendment seeking to expand the rule's exclusions regarding shareholder proposals to limit shareholders' input dealing with elections in general, while Bebchuk's theories will be relied upon to… [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
July 19, 2007) (concluding that the "defendants' description of [the plaintiff] as a racist" was, as a matter of law, "an opinion and thus is not actionable"); Smith v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas & Parry),… [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
Smith v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:53 pm
Ltd v. [read post]
