Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 441 - 460
of 4,259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2021, 4:14 pm
V, § 2. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:15 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:10 am
Cir. 2007), the Federal Circuit held that US patent rights are only exhausted through a first sale “in the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:01 am
Holder, the United States seeks to remove from the United States a lawful permanent resident who has lived here since 1974, because he was convicted of voluntary manslaughter in 1989. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
the smallest saleable patent practising unit (SSPPU) (see Kat friend Richard Vary's comment in the last update here). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:35 pm
Part V concludes with a recommendation that investment chapters be struck from the TPP and other trade agreements or that such chapters should not apply whatsoever to the protection or enforcement of IPRs given the many other enforcement powers available to patent holders. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:18 am
United States, 137 S. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am
United States, in which the state has asked it to overturn the lower courts’ decisions blocking enforcement of four provisions of its controversial immigration law, S.B. 1070. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 9:49 am
Zeneca and ICI agreed to: (1) pay Barr $21 million; (2) pay Barr's supplier $35.9 million; and (3) supply Barr with Zeneca-manufactured tamoxifen for resale in the United States at a high royalty rate. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:51 am
The United States Supreme Court recently said it would consider whether Costco Wholesale Corp. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:41 pm
On Tuesday, April 26, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Mathis v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 8:08 am
Katz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
Perry, United States Supreme Court (6/26/13)United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 2:50 pm
In support of such informal abandonment, the taxpayer cited United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 2:35 pm
Many immigrants caught in the mandatory detention dragnet are longtime residents of the United States who have rehabilitated themselves, raised families and they will now have the opportunity to make an individualized case against their detention. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 2:35 pm
Many immigrants caught in the mandatory detention dragnet are longtime residents of the United States who have rehabilitated themselves, raised families and they will now have the opportunity to make an individualized case against their detention. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:30 am
Infousa, Inc. the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit determined that the district court properly ruled the relevant patent claims of US Patent No. 6,631,400 were invalid as a result of being obvious. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 12:11 pm
At issue in Lexmark is whether gray-market goods embodying patented inventions can be imported or sold in the United States without the permission of the U.S. patent holder. [read post]
